'Hard Evidence' Biden Admin Colluded with Big Tech to Censor COVID Vaccine 'Misinformation'
Our government went to shocking lengths to silence dissent and manipulate the narrative on COVID-19 vaccines.
You may want to sit down for this. Even if you’re red-pilled like me (i.e., you already understand the true nature of a particular situation), the depths by which our government has gone to manipulate us as it relates to COVID-19 vaccines and the massive conspiracy they are engaged in with pharmaceutical companies, various entities, and Big Tech is alarming — and now there’s more evidence to prove it. The next time you’re met with skepticism that our government would ever lie to us, share this.
Missouri's new Attorney General, Andrew Bailey, claims he has "hard evidence" that the Biden Administration colluded with social media companies to censor differing viewpoints and silence “misinformation” on COVID-19 that later turned out to be true.
This evidence was obtained as part of a massive lawsuit filed by Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry and former Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt against the Biden administration and 67 defendants for allegedly colluding with social media companies to censor freedom of speech on several topics, including COVID-19.
In emails released today on Twitter, Bailey disclosed an email from White House employee Clarke Humphrey to Twitter asking the social media giant to remove a tweet by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. "ASAP." As Bailey pointed out, Kennedy is an outspoken critic of the White House's COVID-19 narrative.
The White House took issue with Kennedy's tweet insinuating Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine may have caused Hank Aaron's death.
The White House employee then asked Twitter to "keep an eye out" for tweets that “fall in this same genre.”
In another email shared by Bailey, Rob Flaherty, White House Director of Digital Strategy, emailed Facebook to ask that they remove specific posts by prominent conservatives related to COVID vaccines. The first post at issue was by Fox News host Tucker Carlson, who insinuated the vaccines don’t work. The second post was by Tomi Lehren, who said she would not get a COVID shot.
The Facebook employee responded that he “saw the same thing” when they got off the phone and is “running this down now.”
Here’s an example of Big Tech, specifically YouTube, “toeing the line for Biden.” The Biden administration is clearly attempting to censor speech that may cause vaccine hesitancy, even if that speech is true.
Here’s another instance of collusion. This email provides an example of an article by Children’s Health Defense that violates the “misinformation and harm” policy because it may “contribute to vaccine hesitancy or present a barrier to vaccination.”
In other words, content is not allowed to be posted on social media if it might cause someone to question getting an endless barrage of COVID shots, even if it is true.
The author of the email goes on to provide examples of what types of content violate said policy, including content that contains sensational or alarmist vaccine misrepresentation, TRUE but shocking claims, personal anecdotes (i.e., vaccine injury stories), or “discussing the choice to vaccinate in terms of personal and civil liberties or concerns related to mistrust in institutions or individuals.” Posts that fall into these categories receive the gift of various degrees of censorship.
But wait, it gets better. Below is an email showing the White House couldn’t care less about a product unless it “has a measurable impact” on suppressing speech. In this email, the White House’s Flaherty demands answers on how effective Facebook has been at reducing the spread of “vaccine-skeptical CONTENT and misinformation” to “vaccine fence-sitters” in the “now-folded lockdown.”
In the same email, Flaherty admits Facebook deployed an algorithm to promote “quality news and information” to users about “the election,” but only after the election. He then blames Facebook for election skepticism and the Jan. 6 “insurrection” and wants assurances Facebook is not “doing the same thing again here” as it pertains to COVID-19 vaccines.
“These emails confirm what we’ve known all along, the Biden Admin has been colluding with social media companies to stifle opposing voices,” Bailey said in a tweet. “I will continue to push back against this blatant attack on the 1st Amendment with every tool at my disposal.”
The Biden administration owes the American people an explanation for why it thinks a government that works for the people, elected by the people, can manipulate the people. We should demand accountability and transparency, and the government should take responsibility for the millions of people who have undoubtedly been injured at the hands of government-perpetuated propaganda.
Hey Megan,
I know you’re aware of the pandemic treaty on the horizon. However, that requires 2/3 approval for ratification, which is daunting even for colluding oligarchs, so there’s been a concerted effort to create effectively the same structure by adding amendments to the existing International Health Regulations (originally ratified in 2005).
Obviously, they’re trying to do it with as little fanfare as possible, and they’re about to start convening in secret this month, so if you could bring this to people’s attention, that would be huge.
Here’s the outline:
The International Health Regulations Review Committee (IHRRC) of the World Health Organization (WHO) is planning to meet in secret from Monday, January 9, 2023 to Friday January 13, 2023. The IHRRC will be working to finalize what is now a 46 page document that includes proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR).
The proposed amendments would:
1. Change the overall nature of the World Health Organization from an advisory organization that merely makes recommendations to a governing body whose proclamations would be legally-binding. (Article 1)
2. Greatly expand the scope of the International Health Regulations to include scenarios that merely have a “potential to impact public health.”
3. Seek to remove “respect for dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of people.” (Article 3)
4. Give the Director General of the WHO control over the means of production through an “allocation plan for health products” to require developed states parties to supply pandemic response products as directed. (Article 13A)
5. Give the WHO the authority to require medical examinations, proof of prophylaxis, proof of vaccine and to implement contact tracing, quarantine and TREATMENT. (Article 18)
6. Institute a system of global health certificates in digital or paper format, including test certificates, vaccine certificates, prophylaxis certificates, recovery certificates, passenger locator forms and a traveller’s health declaration. (Articles 18, 23, 24, 27, 28, 31, 35, 36 and 44 and Annexes 6, 7 and 8)
7. Redirect unspecified billions of dollars to the Pharmaceutical Hospital Emergency Industrial Complex with no accountability. (Article 44A)
8. Allow the disclosure of personal health data. (Article 45)
9. Greatly expand the World Health Organization’s capacity to censor what they consider to be mis-information and dis-information. (Annex 1, page 36)
10. Create an obligation to build, provide and maintain IHR infrastructure at points of entry. (Annex 10)
The 76th World Health Assembly is scheduled to occur from Sunday May 21, 2023 to Tuesday May 30, 2023. In order for the proposed amendments to be considered during the 76th World Health Assembly, they must be submitted to the World Health Organization at least 4 months in advance.
The IHRRC plans to submit these proposed amendments to the WHO by Sunday, January 15, 2023.
The International Health Regulations are existing, legally-binding international law. If the proposed amendments are presented to the 76th World Health Assembly, they could be adopted by a simple majority of the 194 member nations. According to the already agreed upon rules of the IHR, if the proposed amendments are adopted, the member nations would not need to take any additional actions. The United States Senate would not be required to provide a two-thirds vote to give their “advice and consent.” No signatures by national leaders would be needed.
The Proposed Amendments to the International Health Regulations:
https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr1/WGIHR_Compilation-en.pdf
For more information, you can contact James Roguski at james.roguski@gmail.com or 310-619-3055 and/or check out his substack:
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/secret-negotiations
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/the-proposed-amendments-to-the-international
Thank you and God bless!!!!
It seems that those who believe the narrative have chosen their worldview because it works for them. They speak of a sense of togetherness and agree with each other on everything. They're angry at us because we don't conform. And they are convinced they are right and good. We will never convince them, no matter how many facts we show. They don't want to be convinced. They have gained so much through this worldview they have been groomed to have that they don't want to give it up. Only loss or injury might make them ask questions.
Getting on with life, unafraid even if things get crazier, and not trying to prove anything will have an impact eventually, because one day they will see how bored and stuck they are. Vindication will come if we let God lead the way.