I'm still hung up on the cv immunity concept from a prior cv infection... How is it that a fraudulently used PCR test determines the existence of this previous or current "illness", (non-symptomaticatic or otherwise), when the cv "virus" has never been globally isolated, and exists in the MSM as graphic designers' illustration? 🧐
My question.... Is natural immunity to illness caused by exposure to covert distribution of "bioweapons", aerosolized poisons, and EMF, et al, a thing?
My take: The fact that they are injecting babies with this shale tells you everything you need to know. We may never know all the whys (everyone has their own pet big picture theory) but it's a fact that babies don't need it, it doesn't work to stop infection or transmission, its killing and injuring record numbers of people, and Big Pharma gets a free pass on liability if it's on the childhood vax schedule, and Big Pharma, pharmacies, and doctors all make money off of selling the baby jabs to clueless parents.
I also think they were trying to expedite use of digital currency and a digital ID. To monitor everyone, we needed a "digital passport" to go eat dinner, see a play or concert, travel on an airplane, etc.
The digital currency - ultimately banning cash - will be their solution to "real inflation," which is rampant and will not be reversed. I think they wanted to sweeten the pot by giving people digital money - but we all had to agree to use only the government digital money.
Now this plan hasn't come to fruition yet, but IMO it's still what the Powers that Be want to happen. Covid responses probably did get us closer to this result.
Covid also gave us a massive Censorship Industrial Complex - which is another "key to the operation."
Yes, Twitter is still censored, just a little differently looking now. It looks more like GETTR now, lots of Republican ranting and not a lot of solid information being shared in the lots of click posts. It is the ranty posts that get a lot of spread. Jikileaks has said his reach is reduced now and he is big CoV science voice.
Because getting it on the child "vaccine" schedule provides the manufacturers with immunity from civil liability.
Of course, if you try to explain this to a shitlib mouth breather, they'll blather about the Polio vax.
Word games, no matter how transparently idiotic, never stop working on these people. This is how we have a "she/her" brigade that's pretty sure men can get pregnant.
Thanks for this, which I cross-posted at my newsletter. Years ago, I wrote a story about a UK study that showed that only six "healthy" children in the entire UK (allegedly) died from Covid in the first year of the pandemic. There are 12 million children in the UK, so six deaths divided by 12 million children is a mortality rate of 0.000 percent ... No child EVER needed this non-vaccine.
Well, they may not have reduced infection and severe disease, but they most certainly have saved millions of lives in the US from a premature death according to the influential medical experts who lead the committees responsible for approving child vaccinations. Even though medical experts watching the committees as they approve these vaccines claim they never address the real issues underlying their medical concerns. So, the public is left with basically he said, she said as the poison continues to be administered to our kids.
Our public health experts seem to suffer from an "Ideology" that is reminiscent of the old Soviet Union where morality consisted of doing what was best for the Party to succeed.
After the narrative that the shots prevent infection was debunked, the new narrative/spin became, "well, the shots prevent severe illness." This is a lie on top of the previous lie. There's also no convincing evidence or study that shows the vaccinated cohort is less likely to develop a severe case.
FWIW, public health officials use the same argument to push the annual flu "vaccines." The argument, which few people question, is "you might still get the flu, but you'll have a much milder case of the flu" if you'd gotten that year's flu shot.
That's bunk too as the millions of people who dutifully get their flu vaccines - and then get a bad case of the flu - should be able to attest. (For example, the only year I ever got a flu shot, I got the flu - and I was on my ass for a week.)
Thank you for the additional evidence regarding this crime against humanity. My “he said, she said” caricaturizing was made after reading the responses from Dr Paul Offit and Dr Peter Marks. Godspeed to you in your efforts to obtain justice. Here is an additional link that may be of some help to you.
A travesty. Lack of knowledge of how infants,babies,juveniles immune systems develop. And likely no ears to hear about it from those who could offer advice.
I sent this to my daughter, I'm so hopeful that they haven't/don't let the Drs convince them to give these to their young children.
the link says it has timed out, could you please give me the journal citation, google isnt cooperating
https://academic.oup.com/jpids/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jpids/piae121/7917119
Thanks
I'm still hung up on the cv immunity concept from a prior cv infection... How is it that a fraudulently used PCR test determines the existence of this previous or current "illness", (non-symptomaticatic or otherwise), when the cv "virus" has never been globally isolated, and exists in the MSM as graphic designers' illustration? 🧐
My question.... Is natural immunity to illness caused by exposure to covert distribution of "bioweapons", aerosolized poisons, and EMF, et al, a thing?
Thanks for reporting.
My take: The fact that they are injecting babies with this shale tells you everything you need to know. We may never know all the whys (everyone has their own pet big picture theory) but it's a fact that babies don't need it, it doesn't work to stop infection or transmission, its killing and injuring record numbers of people, and Big Pharma gets a free pass on liability if it's on the childhood vax schedule, and Big Pharma, pharmacies, and doctors all make money off of selling the baby jabs to clueless parents.
All of your facts are ... true. And should resonate with a few more people.
Diabolical plot to reduce fertility and increase death rates. International agreement to reduce populations.
I also think they were trying to expedite use of digital currency and a digital ID. To monitor everyone, we needed a "digital passport" to go eat dinner, see a play or concert, travel on an airplane, etc.
The digital currency - ultimately banning cash - will be their solution to "real inflation," which is rampant and will not be reversed. I think they wanted to sweeten the pot by giving people digital money - but we all had to agree to use only the government digital money.
Now this plan hasn't come to fruition yet, but IMO it's still what the Powers that Be want to happen. Covid responses probably did get us closer to this result.
Covid also gave us a massive Censorship Industrial Complex - which is another "key to the operation."
Yes, Twitter is still censored, just a little differently looking now. It looks more like GETTR now, lots of Republican ranting and not a lot of solid information being shared in the lots of click posts. It is the ranty posts that get a lot of spread. Jikileaks has said his reach is reduced now and he is big CoV science voice.
My "reach" on Substack started dropping off a cliff about eight months ago.
I have little reach here and it seemed to get even worse a little while ago too.
Because getting it on the child "vaccine" schedule provides the manufacturers with immunity from civil liability.
Of course, if you try to explain this to a shitlib mouth breather, they'll blather about the Polio vax.
Word games, no matter how transparently idiotic, never stop working on these people. This is how we have a "she/her" brigade that's pretty sure men can get pregnant.
Thanks for this, which I cross-posted at my newsletter. Years ago, I wrote a story about a UK study that showed that only six "healthy" children in the entire UK (allegedly) died from Covid in the first year of the pandemic. There are 12 million children in the UK, so six deaths divided by 12 million children is a mortality rate of 0.000 percent ... No child EVER needed this non-vaccine.
I also turned a comment I make below at this site into my latest Substack column. So thanks for the indirect column idea!
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/when-narrative-a-is-debunked-go-to
Well, they may not have reduced infection and severe disease, but they most certainly have saved millions of lives in the US from a premature death according to the influential medical experts who lead the committees responsible for approving child vaccinations. Even though medical experts watching the committees as they approve these vaccines claim they never address the real issues underlying their medical concerns. So, the public is left with basically he said, she said as the poison continues to be administered to our kids.
Our public health experts seem to suffer from an "Ideology" that is reminiscent of the old Soviet Union where morality consisted of doing what was best for the Party to succeed.
Huh? "but they most certainly have saved millions of lives..." Oh please!
(Everything else you stated seems sensible.)
I was being facetious.
I was hoping!
After the narrative that the shots prevent infection was debunked, the new narrative/spin became, "well, the shots prevent severe illness." This is a lie on top of the previous lie. There's also no convincing evidence or study that shows the vaccinated cohort is less likely to develop a severe case.
FWIW, public health officials use the same argument to push the annual flu "vaccines." The argument, which few people question, is "you might still get the flu, but you'll have a much milder case of the flu" if you'd gotten that year's flu shot.
That's bunk too as the millions of people who dutifully get their flu vaccines - and then get a bad case of the flu - should be able to attest. (For example, the only year I ever got a flu shot, I got the flu - and I was on my ass for a week.)
This comment thread produced this column ...
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/when-narrative-a-is-debunked-go-to
You might say a sliding scale of “abstract” benefits: stop transmission, lessened severity, didn’t die!
Any narrative works if there's no real "watchdog" press to expose the liars.
Thank you for the additional evidence regarding this crime against humanity. My “he said, she said” caricaturizing was made after reading the responses from Dr Paul Offit and Dr Peter Marks. Godspeed to you in your efforts to obtain justice. Here is an additional link that may be of some help to you.
https://thefederalist.com/2024/11/26/big-pharma-still-wont-come-clean-about-the-covid-shots-deadly-side-effects/
The greater question is why is anyone being given any vaccine?
Shame on our public health agencies. I pray more parents wake up to the dangers and lies.
A travesty. Lack of knowledge of how infants,babies,juveniles immune systems develop. And likely no ears to hear about it from those who could offer advice.